Brandorr wrote:
> On 8/29/07, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Do you really want to do "apt-get source SUNWcsr" and have it get the
>> entire ON source tree?
> 
> Just because the packaging and install system supports source
> installs, doesn't mean that every project will initially provide
> source.

>From the end-user expectation such projects should be clearly marked
that they don't provide source, in the spirit of Debian "they don't
belong to main", in the spirit of Ubuntu "they belong to commercial
repository"...

> Also a personal long term goal of mine is to eventual sort out
> the nest of cyclical dependencies in ON and streamline that
> consolidation. (There is a hell of a lot that I need to learn between
> now and that time, so that I can even determine if it is possible).

go for it, you will be rewarded, such project is needed more and more.

I have started with pure Nexenta based ON install and started to add
piece by piece necessary software packages and recompiled ONNV between
each step to see where I get. The initial result is not bad, I was able
to compile src/unix without bigger problems, however I had a mixed
feeling with the rest (/usr/cmd) Some of the things need gcc, some of
them need CC, some of them need java, wbem, whatever... each of it has
its own makefile defining each own variables (of course used by other
projects)..., some of the things compile in multiple passes, and of
course there is no docs, it's just one big ... well WOS.

just my .2 cents,
Martin

-- 
http://martinman.net
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to