On 8/29/07, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brandorr wrote: > ... > > One more thing to add. Stephen says lets deal with source packaging > > and building standards later, because we would run into too much flak > > converting everyone to the same build standard. (This seems to include > > mostly non-OpenSolaris projects). > > > > I am thinking it is better to have a standard now, and let people > > convert their source packaging over to the standard over time. > > (Decouple "selecting a source package build standard", from "deploying > > that standard across the board"). > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > So long as you're not implying that "deploying binaries to end users" be > held hostage to "selecting a source package build standard", feel free > to tilt at that windmill ;-) >
I've had my say. I am not writing the code, so ultimately it is not up to me. I just don't want to end up in a situation where we haven't given people a standard option for repository based source distribution and building, and a dozen different methods pop up, depending on what project it is. Cheers, Brian -- - Brian Gupta http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/ _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
