> If you don't want to run the risk of running into > surprises, then don't > run the development builds.
Don't give me that *($&@#$^& PLEEEEEASE! Only two, or at most three, more months to the scheduled official "release" date (according to your "definition"). As one very honorable person once said, only the paranoid survive--the key word is "survive". You can live in your own cocoon, but not many of us who have invested so much of our time, voluntarily as well as enthusiastically, on this stuff--and for so long. Patience will not run forever. A poorly packaged "release" (or "build" if you insist on the exact wording) is an opportunity (for greater extent of debugging) lost. If the development team is short on hands, ostensibly due to RIFs, then perhaps someone in control could try to enlist some of us (non-Sun) for the pre-release (i.e., release of a build) testing. Anyway, the priority is to get the job done right. I am not interested in playing with words. Please keep in mind that it is farkingly offensive to assume that only Sun has a stake in seeing the success of OpenSolaris. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
