Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.
It is all because you requested that we take his opinion in this matter.

On 9 December 2016 at 22:21, C CHADWELL <[email protected]>
wrote:

> It is so helpful to receive input from those with the maximum
> knowledge/familiarity with a genus, especially
> for examples we have been uncertain about.
>
> *Naturally, it is of special interest to members of this group, when a
> species, subspecies or variety has their range*
> *extended into Indian territory or recognised only in Indian territory.*
>
> *As far as I know, Richards 'determination' (not sure if he would count it
> as such) for this plant from Munsyari means this *
> *represents the first record of Primula boothii in Uttarakhand, as is the
> case for **Primula gracilipes from Gori Valley.*
>
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
>
> Chris Chadwell
>
>
> 81 Parlaunt Road
> SLOUGH
> SL3 8BE
> UK
>
> www.shpa.org.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
> *To:* efloraofindia <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* D.S Rawat <[email protected]>; Satish Phadke <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, 9 December 2016, 12:20
> *Subject:* Fwd: Fwd: [efloraofindia:256995] Re: Plumbaginaceae,
> Primulaceae & Myrsinaceae Fortnight 1-14June2014: Primula petiolaris(?)
> from Uttarakhand_DSR_22
>
> Thanks a lot, Richards ji.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *JOHN RICHARDS*
> Date: 9 December 2016 at 15:36
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:256995] Re: Plumbaginaceae, Primulaceae &
> Myrsinaceae Fortnight 1-14June2014: Primula petiolaris(?) from
> Uttarakhand_DSR_22
> To: "J.M. Garg" <[email protected]>
>
>
> Dear Mr Garg,
> Many thanks for sending these images. They are of P. boothii, not P.
> petiolaris or P. gracilipes. Both the former species have much shorter
> flower stems. For P. boothii please note the following characters:
> no farina
> long slender usually reddish flower stems
> calyx which is angled, due to each sepal being keeled (like a house roof)
> often (not always) red colour in leaf veins etc
> This is a forest species from Annapurna eastwards to west Bhutan. Most
> flower in April, but there is an autumn flowering subspecies ssp.
> autumnalis, also a stoloniferous ssp. repens.
>
> John Richards
>
>
> On Friday, 9 December 2016, 5:46, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, Richards ji,
> May I request you to pl. help in the matter as requested by Chris Chadwell
> ji.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *J.M. Garg* <[email protected]>
> Date: 6 December 2016 at 13:02
> Subject: Fwd: [efloraofindia:256995] Re: Plumbaginaceae, Primulaceae &
> Myrsinaceae Fortnight 1-14June2014: Primula petiolaris(?) from
> Uttarakhand_DSR_22
> To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com
> <[email protected]>>
> Cc: "D.S Rawat" <[email protected]>
>
>
> Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
> Some earlier relevant feedback:
> Thanks for sending additional images.  I will quote further from 'Primula'
> which states that few species have been so misunderstood as Primula
> petiolaris.  As the earliest described species in the section it was used
> as a dustbin during the 19th century, most petiolarids being assigned to
> it.  As the section became better understood, most of these were split off
> but so few specimens of the type plant existed that they were
> misinterpreted.
>
> Unfortunately, Wallich's type specimen was collected in the summer with a
> few off-season flowers, so it has summer leaves with long petioles
> untypical of the usual flowering conditions (hence the name of this
> species, and indeed the section).  Further it was not realized that flowers
> of pink petiolarids dry blue.  *Many 19th Century pressed specimens had
> few, if any field notes - a situation which, regrettably has continued with
> too many Indian botanists gathering scrappy, often poor pressed specimens
> and almost no field notes (such as flower colour) to **make attempts to
> reliable identify more difficult to name primulas (and other genera) that
> much harder (to impossible).*
>
> Anyhow, according to Richards the plant photographed above Munsyari is not
> P.petiolaris.  It is a shame that the calyces photographed are not in
> focus.  They are supposed to be tightly clasps, blunter lobes.  There is a
> total absence of meal plus cup-shaped flowers, tight, crisped rosette at
> flowering with almost stem-less flowers.  It is also smaller.
>
> The authors of Flora of Bhutan speak of differences between forms of
> P.petiolaris in Bhutan and those in Nepal.  It may well be forms in
> Uttarkhand are somewhat different as well, so their comments as to
> Bhutanese and Sikkimese specimens might not apply further West?
>
> IF this plant is P.gracilipes then it has not been recorded from what was
> Kumaon previously.  As the differences have been so poorly understood, the
> old records are probably somewhat meaningless and few in number.
>
> *As Richards thinks P.gracilipes could be considered a subspecies of
> P.petiolaris, his opinion, should, for the present, rank the highest.  It
> would be helpful if someone could forward these images and accompanying
> information to him, for his thoughts.*
>
> *In the mean time, how about calling these plants Primula petiolaris sensu
> lato or Primula petiolaris subspecies gracilipes?  Or Primula sp. aff.
> petiolaris?   This indicates the uncertainty.*
>
> *If group members can send in more good-quality images of petiolarids (and
> all other primulas for that making) with close-up, in focus images of
> flowers (upper and lower surface of petals, sepals, stalks, upper and lower
> leaf surfaces) plus good field notes, then this will help us clarify the
> situation.*
>
> *Without more images showing all the necessary characteristics of a number
> of other collections, it is impossible to add much to the uncertainty which
> seems to remain.*
>
> *So, I hope group members are inspired to get up into the mountains to
> look for Primulas - in the case of the petiolarids, they are not found at
> extreme altitudes or terrain, so most members should be able to undertake
> the required treks/walks.*
>
> *Look forward to lots of Primula images in 2017.*
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Chris Chadwell
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *D.S Rawat* <[email protected]>
> Date: 18 November 2016 at 15:12
> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:256995] Re: Plumbaginaceae, Primulaceae &
> Myrsinaceae Fortnight 1-14June2014: Primula petiolaris(?) from
> Uttarakhand_DSR_22
> To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com
> <[email protected]>>
> Cc: chrischadwell261@btinternet. com <[email protected]>,
> [email protected]
>
>
> Attaching more images as desired.
> This primula was shot above Munsyari (Pithoragarh District, Kumaon,
> Uttarakhand) at an elevation of about 2600-2700m. It was growing on a moist
> vertical mossy slope in second fortnight of March 2013. As I understand
> with increasing spring temperature the habitat was becoming drier. Some
> tetramerous flowers are also visible (marked in image-2).
> DSRawat Pantnagar
>
>
> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 2:24:32 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji, for looking at all posts in this genera in efi.
> Catalogue of life
> <http://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/4c16f03bb909a78dc595a58aacaf4294>
> states *Primula petiolaris *Wall. to be an accepted name.
>
> May I request Rawat ji to pl. post other images.
>
>
> On 10 November 2016 at 05:05, [email protected] m
> <[email protected]> <[email protected] om
> <[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> I am unsure about this.  Richards observes that few species have been so
> misunderstood as Primula petiolaris Wallich.
>
> I see that it is no longer an accepted number in 'The Plant List'.  *So
> what has replaced it?   Primula gracilipes perhaps?*
>
> It is still on the 'Primula World' site but the only images are of
> cultivated plants and some of these could easily be hybrids.
>
> Cannot say the image shot in Uttarakhand matches the images on the above
> site.
>
> According to Richards it is found in Nepal & Sikkim plus two early records
> from Kumaon.    Flowers of Himalaya says Uttaranachal to Sikkim @
> 2400-3600m.
>
> Richards says throughout Nepal sometimes growing and hybridising with
> Primula gracilipes.
>
> *I am uncertain as to the differences between P.petiolaris and
> P.gracilipes.  They are closely related.  Richards considers the latter
> might well be considered a subspecies of the former!  Differing in the
> almost stemless (those in the photo do have stalks), tightly clasped
> blunter sepal-lobes (which cannot be observed in the image) and the total
> absence of meal - though sometimes meal is not prominent.  *
>
> *Is there anyone who can comment with authority?  And tell us the correct
> nomenclature/taxonomic treatment?*
>
> *Flowers of the Himalaya say that Primula gracilipes is the most frequent
> petiolarid Primula in Bhutan (and Sikkim).  They consider P,petiolaris much
> smaller and the two may be CONSPECIFIC i.e. being the same species!*
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 12, 2014 at 9:31:07 AM UTC+1, D.S Rawat wrote:
>
> This Primula also shot in Munsyari area Uttarakhand resembles to *Primula
> petiolaris* Wallich with its irregularly toothed petals.
> Validation (or otherwise) is requested.
>
> Dr D.S.Rawat
> Department of Biological Sciences, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture &
> Technology Pantnagar-263 145 Uttarakhand, INDIA
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@goog legroups.com
> <[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/grou p/indiantreepix
> <https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix>.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>
>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
> world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia
> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
> database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
> The whole world uses my Image Resource
> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@goog legroups.com
> <[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/grou p/indiantreepix
> <https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
> world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia
> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
> database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
> The whole world uses my Image Resource
> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
> world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia
> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
> database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
> The whole world uses my Image Resource
> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
> Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
> world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia
> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
> database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).
> The whole world uses my Image Resource
> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
> thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
> (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
> per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>
>
>


-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg

'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>

Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
<https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>.

For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the
world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia
website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species
database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).

The whole world uses my Image Resource
<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a
thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
(arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as
per Creative Commons license attached with each image.

Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
India'.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to