it's been a long day, that should have been NEC 695
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Murphy, Mark
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 3:16 PM
To: info-tech@aea8.k12.ia.us
Subject: RE: [info-tech] more standardization
We have had very good luck with the NEC 795 projector in Webster
City as well. Good image and very easy to maintain.
Mark Murphy
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henn, Layne
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 1:50 PM
To: info-tech@aea8.k12.ia.us
Subject: [info-tech] more standardization
We are trying to standardize on a projector to put in
classrooms.
* I have gotten opinions from some teachers
around our district, but for the most part, they aren't picky, they just
want the bulbs to last forever.
* It seems to me that 2 video inputs is a very
nice feature, for switching between computer and doc. cam or other
source.
* A VGA video input is nice as well as Svideo
(although I've never seen it used) for DVD/VCR or video cameras
* What other features do you folks look at when
purchasing projectors? For the most part, they won't be mounted. Is
there a specific brand that bulbs are more reasonable on?
* Is anyone using wireless connections to
projectors successfully? We have a few, but the wireless network
(internet) connection is given up when connecting to the wireless proj.
Teachers don't like that.
* As always, price is a factor, but it seems
that most of these manufacturers are making money on the bulbs,
warranties and not the projector itself.
Layne A. Henn
712.224.7423
<http://www.siouxcityschools.org/>
<<image003.jpg>>
