On Feb 1, 2008 11:10 PM, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Antony Dovgal wrote: > > > On 01.02.2008 23:26, Marcus Boerger wrote: > > > Sorry for not writing this earlier. So how does this idea sound? > > > > It sounds quite bad. > > > > If you want to do something good for PHP - either respect its rules, or go > > away. > > Changing the rules to fit your needs is not acceptable. > > I don't have a particular horse to back in this race, and I realize > people are passionate on both sides, but can we please have a polite > discussion on this topic?
There was nothing not polite in Tony's reply. > Furthermore, I think Marcus has contributed enough to PHP that he does > not deserve to hear that what would be good for PHP is for him to "go > away." PDO opinions aside, I don't think any of us would actually > think that would put PHP in a more healthy situation. The targets were these/this companies(y) pushing CLA in php.net when it is not necessary to contribute. It has been proven already since months on a nearly daily basis. For example: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/discuss/msgReader$268 and the numerous contributions from IBM people. -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
