Personally I do a full pecl checkout alongside my php-src checkout, every
time. The problems with that tend to come out during the build.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcus Boerger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2
Hello Steph,
you would not checkout php-default. That would only be used for release
management. Instead you would checkout php-src and whatever pecl modules
you
wanted, just as you do today. And that includes that you can choose
whether
you like CLA modules or not. Just as today you do not get all PECL
modules.
marcus
Saturday, February 2, 2008, 8:52:44 PM, you wrote:
all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field
and
a
CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move
as
much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can.
Hm but then when you checked out you'd have CLA'd stuff as well as normal
PECL stuff, as now. Don't you find you automatically tend to fix things
if
they're broken? I know I do... even if I rarely get around to posting
those
fixes (because once everything works here I go on to the stuff I wanted
to
do and forget there was even a problem, until the next time.)
I was just trying to find a way that would be acceptable to php.net and
also
would mean PDO2 driver development doesn't have to wait on PECL process
decisions, but actually my off-list feedback says even a PECLA module
wouldn't be an acceptable option for some.
- Steph
marcus
Best regards,
Marcus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
