Moin Lukas,
Now, PECL has a couple of CLA'd modules already. I don't like them being
there, and you have stated your own opinion loud and clear. I think we
should be looking for some way to separate out CLA'd PECL modules to
elsewhere but leave the PECL structure in place for those modules. It's
important to offer at least that much, because as long as the licensing
is sound, CLA'd or not CLA'd doesn't impact end users - just
contributors.
Well thanks to a separate PEAR channel, we have all the infrastructure
easily setup to have a different place for users to pick up the code. Or
are you more concerned about the CVS, than the distribution of the
packages?
Eh? No, I'm concerned about binaries in the Windows version. We just don't
have a working pecl install option. If anyone wants CVS they can use cvs or
tortoisecvs or whatever, but that's irrelevant to users...
Why copy to PECL in this case? Shouldnt it just be part of the PHP
distribution QA process?
Nobody liked my original PECLA idea (separate CVS module for CLA'd stuff but
all PECL resources shared), so I'm trying to give it a different angle :) I
preferred the first version tho'.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
