Hi 2010/8/11 Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>: > I like the idea, though it looks like this function is a re-implementation > of the engine parsing, which is not good. The function that actually reuses > the engine function would be much better.
I did have a short peak at the code and yes I belive we could implement such a function relatively more simple than pecl/params > Ahother thing - for core I think it has to be named something like > func_parse_args() to be in line with func_get_args() etc. and some error > feedback (like, which parameter failed and why) wouldn't hurt. I thought the same, and then implementing it in zend_builtin_functions in line with the other func_*() utilities. > But having such thing in core would be very nice. Though it wouldn't solve > the current debate about types/params, since the whole idea is for it to > work without calling additional functions. Indeed it doesn't solve the current arguments for and against type hinting. But its a good step in the right direction for a better way to parse passed parameters from a library developer perspective. -- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen ka...@php.net -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
