On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> Also, it's important to clarify that the [soon-to-be-popular] >> built-in web server is not part of this alpha because the alpha was >> tagged a few days before its addition. I think repackaging would be >> worth it for this case, but waiting for alpha2 is feasible. > > We'll have alpha2 in a month. I'm really not a fan on last minute > repackaging, that's when screw ups happen almost every time.
I do think we should repackage. There are many issues fixed since last week and it makes no sense to release something not representing what the current 5.4 branch is. It takes 1h~ to do it, no big deal. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
