On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 22:48 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On 9/2/11 1:41 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > >> > >> I think you missed the referenced [1]: > >> > >> [1] Yes, we will still allow building with libmysql and we will fix bugs > >> reported there and we will verify it works but focus on mysqlnd, as > >> we're actually handling it already > > > > I did not miss it - I do not see what it means. Either we support both - and > > then for the matter of development and testing nothing changes - or > > something changes, namely "we remove one moving piece out of the test > > equation", the moving piece being libmysql - and "remove" means "remove". I > > just don't see how you can have both of these things at the same time. > > I think that Johannes means that mysqld would be the preferred or > baseline for the mysql tests. > maybe supporting IE6 would be a good metaphor: you could say that you > support every browser equally, or you could say that you write your > stuff for the modern browsers and tests it against IE6 and fix where > necessary. > Johannes, is this what you had in mind?
Thanks, I like your analogy and don't have a better one. johannes > > -- > Ferenc Kovács > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
