On 14 Jan 2013, at 12:57, Ben Ramsey <ram...@php.net> wrote: > On 1/14/13 11:54 AM, Scott MacVicar wrote: >> On 14 Jan 2013, at 11:37, Ben Ramsey <ram...@php.net> wrote: >> >>> On 1/11/13 6:17 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote: >>>> I've opened voting for the array_column() function RFC. >>>> >>>> You can vote at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_column#voting >>> >>> I have updated the pull request by removing the array_pluck() alias. I >>> favor the array_column() alias, as it is more in keeping with other >>> function names like array_keys() and array_values(), which do not have >>> verbs in them. >>> >>> If the RFC is accepted, I will submit a new pull request against the 5.5 >>> branch and close the current pull request against the 5.3 branch. If I >>> should do that now, please let me know, and I'll go ahead and take care of >>> it. >> >> I've talked about the Facebook version of this when the key bit got added, >> but we have 2 other methods to go with it. >> >> mpull() which does methods >> https://github.com/facebook/libphutil/blob/master/src/utils/utils.php#L110 >> >> ppull() which does properties >> https://github.com/facebook/libphutil/blob/master/src/utils/utils.php#L184 >> >> Not sure if these should be added separately? The property version is good >> for PDO when using FETCH_CLASS. >> >> - S >> > > I did review these, and I like them, but I think they should be added > separately, especially since they deal more with objects than arrays.
As long as the work with objects that implement ArrayAccess then it should be fine? - S -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
