> Yup sure. We are going to vote yes (behind my nickname). > However, while I agree with all your arguments, we have more syntax and more semantics, it's kind of confusing. > But it's a small one, > so +1 for us.
I bet there is no way to add such a feature without adding at least a small amount of syntax, and that's why I aimed for the minimal approach. Also, there is no better time to have it added other than on a major version release. Thanks for your questions and your vote :)
