Definitely +1 for me. That what I proposed before. you make it happened ;-)
On 12 February 2015 at 22:25, Marcio Almada <marcio.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yup sure. We are going to vote yes (behind my nickname). > > However, while I agree with all your arguments, we have more syntax and > more semantics, it's kind of confusing. > > But it's a small one, > > so +1 for us. > > I bet there is no way to add such a feature without adding at least a small > amount of syntax, and that's why I aimed for the minimal approach. Also, > there is no better time to have it added other than on a major version > release. > > Thanks for your questions and your vote :) > -- Reeze Xia http://reeze.cn
