Am 12.01.16 um 16:45 schrieb Sascha Schumann:
>> During the CoC-Discussion the idea came up to vote certain CoC-issues
>> (call them whatever you like) in a more secure way so that no one sould
>> be able to bully someone into an - for him or her - inappropriate
>> decission. One way to do so could be a somehow anonymised vote.
> 
> Is discussing things openly considered 'bullying'?

It should not. But it seems that sometimes people have different
understandings of what is appropriate.
> 
>> So I think we have to distinguish between technical votes on what way
>> the language itself develops (which should always be open and as
>> transparent as possible) and non-technical votes (which can be very
>> personal and should therefore respect the privacy of the voter).
> 
> As this concerns the future of the community, the vote should definitely be
> public, and not secret. 

Definitely!!! And that requires an RFC that - at least in my eyes -
needs a 2/3rd(+1) majority to be accepted *because* it concerns the
future of the community!

Cheers

Andreas
-- 
                                                              ,,,
                                                             (o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl                                                       |
| mailto:andr...@heigl.org                  N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| http://andreas.heigl.org                       http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://hei.gl/root-ca                                               |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to