Am 12.01.16 um 16:45 schrieb Sascha Schumann: >> During the CoC-Discussion the idea came up to vote certain CoC-issues >> (call them whatever you like) in a more secure way so that no one sould >> be able to bully someone into an - for him or her - inappropriate >> decission. One way to do so could be a somehow anonymised vote. > > Is discussing things openly considered 'bullying'?
It should not. But it seems that sometimes people have different understandings of what is appropriate. > >> So I think we have to distinguish between technical votes on what way >> the language itself develops (which should always be open and as >> transparent as possible) and non-technical votes (which can be very >> personal and should therefore respect the privacy of the voter). > > As this concerns the future of the community, the vote should definitely be > public, and not secret. Definitely!!! And that requires an RFC that - at least in my eyes - needs a 2/3rd(+1) majority to be accepted *because* it concerns the future of the community! Cheers Andreas -- ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andr...@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | | http://andreas.heigl.org http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://hei.gl/root-ca | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature