> On Jan 13, 2016, at 13:58, Chase Peeler <chasepee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think you're actually missing the point as to why most of the people > were against a CoC (or at least the proposed CoC). It wasn't a matter of > what the status quo was, but that the CoC, at best, wouldn't solve the > issues it was meant to solve (whether such issues existed is irrelevant) > and, at worst, would lead a more negative atmosphere rife with unintended > consequences. Yes, there were a few people asking "do we even need this," > but in terms of those against the proposal, they were the minority from > what I could tell. > > tl;dr; - Even if you could never find a more wretched hive of scum and > villainy than PHP internals, I (and my others) would still not support the > proposed CoC.
To quote Larry, "^^ This." -- Paul M. Jones pmjone...@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
