On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Zachary <[email protected]> wrote: > Finding responsible people who are still interested in quake 3 tech has been > difficult as of late.
I consider myself responsible, but I don't have time. :-/ Otherwise our fork would be further along. :-D How do you evaluate people for this? I guess you need to be able to trust them not to throw the basic ideals over board, i.e. tech preservation and compatibility vs. forward development? Without someone keeping track for a while, that's hard to do I guess. Maybe that hg or git or whatever DVCS move would really help. At least then the forks could be organized a little and patches could move from branches to mainline a bit easier than right now. -- |ALPHA| Mad Professor <[email protected]> http://www.urtalphaclan.com/ <><><> Home of El Guapo! _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
