>> e.g. in the absense of rapid renumbering and gse or other non-v4 routing,
>> what need is sufficiently important to justify a6?
> Unless something happened to routing I'm not aware of (which is
> certainly possible), we still need rapid renumbering.

we NEED both, and, imiho, routing far more than rapid renumbering.  but,
in reality we seem to HAVE neither.

> The reason for switching to A6 now, even if we tell people to only ever
> put A6 0 in their zone files, is because it makes it possible to use it
> later.

the set of fun ideas which meet such design criteria may be countable, but
its size is large by even astronomers' standards.

randy
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to