At 8:28 PM +0100 3/18/02, Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > Steve Deering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The u bit in the current IID definition indicates whether or not the > > IID can be considered globally unique. > >=> can I assume you didn't read draft-dupont-ipv6-imei-00.txt? >(you should and I should have answered before :-)
That's normally a safe assumption, but in this case I actually did read your draft. My statement, which you quoted above, is not in conflict with your proposal, so I don't understand what point you are making. >=> my proposal is to use u=1,g=1 for IMEIs. Obviously this collides >with Erik's idea... Yep. Steve -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
