> > actually I'd claim that we don't really understand how link-locals > > work, at least not from the applications viewpoint. but I enthusiastically > > support the idea of separating the work on globals from the work > > on scoped addresses. > > I believe we do have a good understanding on how link-locals > work with utility protocols (ICMP, ND, MLD, routing protocols). > That is why the LL are needed in the base addressing architecture.
agree with this much. I think it's much harder to justify SL. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
