Hi Brian,
> If the WG chooses to follow the recommendations in this document,
> then SBRs will not longer be necessary.
I don't think you can mean that literally. There are lots of
reasons why enterprise networks have border routers today
(not to mention DMZs) and I don't see that the non-existence
of SL addresses would remove those reasons.
Of course. Enterprises will continue to have border routers.
I was using the term "SBR" as it is used in the scoped addressing
architecture -- referring to a router that creates a border between
two different site-local scopes.
Margaret
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
