> > bottom line: the Atlanta poll was essentially meaningless > > except to indicate that there's a significant fraction of the > > group that wants to discourage SLs to some extent. > > I agree. The question that wasn't asked is why they want the > restriction. Of the group that indicated a desire to restrict use of SL, > how many of those were based on the simple fear of change, the unknown, > or that SL automatically leads to nat?
for that matter, similar questions could be asked of those who prefer full/unrestricted use of SL - since proponents of that view have certainly argued against restricting SL purely on the basis that this is a "change", and others have argued that restricting SL automatically leads to NAT. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------