At 07:18 AM 8/9/2003, Bound, Jim wrote:
> We now have a combined local addressing requirements document > <draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt>, a specific > alternative to > site-local addresses draft > <draft-hinden-ipv6-global-local-addr-02.txt> > (accepted as a working group item at the Vienna IETF)
Why do we need both of these? We just need the hinden work. The templin/hain work could be INFO or BCP with some fixing?
Is that the thought?
Yes, that is the plan. The hain-templin document would be published as Informational.
Bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
