-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > The same is true if we create a swamp again and allow individual /48s > in > the global routing table. Then IPv6 will become IPv4 with more bits, > and > in the current economy the net result will be more NAT-aware apps. I'm > sorry to say it bluntly, but today IPv4 is unavoidable and if the only > edge IPv6 has is a bigger address space I'm afraid it won't be enough > to > cut it.
IPv6 IS IPv4 with more bits. > 1. Even if we say that NATv6 is evil, there is little we can do to > prevent it from happening except providing a solution that would bring > somehow similar advantages. We don't need to encourage it... - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.2 iQA/AwUBPzj/qqarNKXTPFCVEQJJ0wCg3io0+MLVfB/pl+2qMao2FOsdIVwAoOl9 IYMty33YJrXtYX0rDeLIG2uq =/SJh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
