On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Ole Troan wrote: > But that's "better value" by making IPv4 work less good. and I'll > postulate that we can make A+P / shared IPv4 work good enough that > end-users who are trained to live behind a NATs will not notice.
You mean, trained to see their downloads/web page updates break all the time, like when they're in the mid of a tourist region during vacation time? Hotel's WLAN's NAT tables clog, mobile phone provider's NAT tables overflow. A lose-lose situation. IPv4 will deteriorate more and more over the years. We have know this for a quarter century now, and there is no way back. -is