Mikael, >> But that's "better value" by making IPv4 work less good. and I'll postulate >> that we can make A+P / shared IPv4 work good enough that end-users who are >> trained to live behind a NATs will not notice. > > Problem with that is that this doesn't work with anything that doesn't have > +P, so for instance my corporate VPN doesn't work because for some reason it > uses GRE. > > I think we're going to have to do some kind of A+P for protocols with port, > and then do CGN (ds.lite) for everything else.
well, I think all applications will just end up having a P. if that means GRE over UDP or something else. I would really have liked us to stop going down this path, but it seems like we're not going to be able to. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
