On Thu, 12 Feb 2015, Ole Troan wrote:
But that's "better value" by making IPv4 work less good. and I'll postulate that we can make A+P / shared IPv4 work good enough that end-users who are trained to live behind a NATs will not notice.
Problem with that is that this doesn't work with anything that doesn't have +P, so for instance my corporate VPN doesn't work because for some reason it uses GRE.
I think we're going to have to do some kind of A+P for protocols with port, and then do CGN (ds.lite) for everything else.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
