Gert Doering wrote on 03/06/2023 13:33:
So how do we get there?
We got where we are now because there are compelling reasons to deploy
ipv4, but not compelling reasons to deploy ipv6. IPv4 is the stone that
rolled down the hill; ipv6 is the stone that, 25 years later, people are
still trying to roll up the hill. What's surprising is that some people
are still surprised that ipv6 won't roll itself up the hill after 25
years of resolutely not doing this by itself.
> So, what else can we do?
Supportive / constructive mandates level out the upwards slope on the
ipv6 hill, a little. Destructive mandates - e.g. "governments should
withdraw ipv4 services" - are more like suggestions to get out a digger
and change the slope of the hill so that the boulder will roll up it.
The only outcome from this sort of approach will be expense, a mixture
of bemusement and rage from bystanders, and ultimate failure.
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
