Dan Lanciani wrote: > > "Tony Hain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > |That said, there are multiple parts to the isolation issue, and even though > |most NAT implementations combine them, the discussion will be more > |constructive to keep them separate. > > I used to believe this, but I recently came to the realization that isolation > from provider address policy is a single issue.
Perhaps, but it is not an issue to which NAT is the only answer. In IPv6 we have enough address space to solve it without NAT. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
