On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Tim Chown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote: > > > > Also, there are basically two versions of "DHCP": the one specified in > > RFC3315, and the "stateless DHCP", in IESG review at the moment. It > > is not clear to which you're referring to here. > > Does that matter to the client?
The sentences start basically like, "If the node implements DHCP, it MUST/SHOULD do foo". Does a stateless DHCP count as implmenting DHCP? Is stateless DHCP non-compliant with Node Requirements? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
