Re: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails)

[Alain Durand]

Catching up with things.

I support Christian objection 100%.
Protocols may be implemented in the stack but turned on/off by 
configuration.

   - Alain.

Christian Huitema wrote:

Also, I think we should revisit this text in the RFC2462bis
effort.  Changing the MUST to MAY in the 5.5.2 paragraph looks like
   

the
 

right change to me, but that's a different email thread.
   

I would agree with that. In any case, I object to tying a MUST condition
to the availability of the code in the implementation. Implementation is
a necessary condition, but so is for example user or admin consent,
maybe battery state, whatever. The text should not speak about
implementation.
-- Christian Huitema

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------