On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:01:51AM -0800, Suresh Satapati wrote: > > Disagree. load-sharing or router preferences were/are never a general case > IMO and hence i disagree with MUST.
I also think the security section of the draft needs a bit of deeper analysis, e.g. for the rogue router-in-the-middle. Also diagnosis of problems may be harder. I think the proposal is interesting, but not a MUST. tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
