I agree that this is the best approach right now.
Brian C
Brian Haberman wrote:
IPv6 WG, This is a status update on the centrally-allocated ULAs defined in draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt. At this time the chairs believe it is prudent to gain operational experience with the locally-assigned ULA specification (which is currently in the RFC Editor's Queue) before continuing work on the centrally-allocated mechanism.
The chairs would like to solicit input from WG members on this approach. Please state your support or disagreement with this approach. Those who disagree, please state rationale for wanting to continue this work at this time.
Regards, Brian & Bob IPv6 WG co-chairs
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------