Thus spake "Brian Haberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > IPv6 WG, > This is a status update on the centrally-allocated ULAs defined in > draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt. At this time the chairs believe it > is prudent to gain operational experience with the locally-assigned > ULA specification (which is currently in the RFC Editor's Queue) > before continuing work on the centrally-allocated mechanism. > > The chairs would like to solicit input from WG members on this > approach. Please state your support or disagreement with this > approach. Those who disagree, please state rationale for wanting > to continue this work at this time.
Agreed. I also believe that we should be watching the IPv6 PI policy proposal at ARIN et al; if the ARIN proposal is approved (and other RIRs follow suit), I see little reason to continue work on centrally-assigned ULAs. S Stephen Sprunk "Stupid people surround themselves with smart CCIE #3723 people. Smart people surround themselves with K5SSS smart people who disagree with them." --Aaron Sorkin -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
