Tim - The answer to your exact question is, of course, yes. But, in
my opinion, that question is not the right starting point for our
conversation.
A better question to start with, which we certainly ought to ask as
members of an engineering organization like the IETF, is: "Is there a
sufficiently large set of scenarios and use cases where the
requirements cannot be met by DHCPv6 PD to warrant the investment of
resources to design, specify, publish, implement and test an entirely
new protocol or protocol extension?".
The IETF has spent far too much effort in defining theoretically
possible protocols.
- Ralph
On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:59 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Do you believe that it is theoretically possible that DHCPv6 PD
would be "neither required nor desired"? It is here that I'd like
to start this portion of our conversation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
