> In effect one can indeed also use ULA-C kind of addresses as > "Identifiers" as they are truly globally unique just like PI, but that > is the whole point why ULA-C is futile: they _are_ just like PI ;) > Except that they will be carved out of a special prefix and > handled in a > strange way. Also as they are not "Internet addresses" but > intended for > disconnected sites and thus should never traverse the Internet except > for in a VPN in the first place.
Also except that they are attainable by very small sites at a (presumably) nominal cost. (Plus, the "except for in a VPN" is likely to be good enough for the kinds of connections ULA-C sites will want to make.) Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
