On 20 Jun 2007, at 7:22pm, Scott Leibrand wrote:
[...]
So am I right in reading your answer as saying that the advantage
of ULA-C is that it solves the same problem that ARIN's IPv6 PI
policy solves but better. In effect, developing ULA-C helps side-
step ARIN's policy development process?
No, it solves a similar problem for a different (though possibly
partially overlapping) set of networks, and reduces the pressure to
apply a hammer when a screwdriver is what's really needed.
I am not sure I understand what you mean by applying a hammer. How is
ULA-C a screwdriver?
Regards,
--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
