Came across this thread... http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg02314.html
However, in looking at draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-03, it seems that this issue was never addressed. Is this intentional? Was there ever an agreement that ND should or should not be done on PPP links? (If there was, I haven't found it yet, only uncertainty and the fact that the IPv6 over PPP RFC has Interoperability problems and that it should be fixed in draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2.) -Dave
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------