Came across this thread...

http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg02314.html

 

However, in looking at draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-03, it seems that
this issue was never addressed.

 

Is this intentional?  Was there ever an agreement that ND should or
should not be done on PPP links?

(If there was, I haven't found it yet, only uncertainty and the fact
that the IPv6 over PPP RFC has

Interoperability problems and that it should be fixed in
draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2.)

 

-Dave

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to