> Hi Bob, > We would like to get your comments on the following two choices: > > 1) Deprecate RH0 as specified in <draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt>.
I vote for this option. It's a clean solution and leaves as well place for a future (re-)definition of additional RH functionalities if needed. My 2 cents Olaf -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------