Hi John, To clarify: - I was talking of sensors immplementing "some" IPv6 - It means companies would not care about this RFC
Julien -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 27 février 2008 14:44 To: Julien Abeille (jabeille); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: the role of the node "requirements" document >My fear is that if implementations on e.g. sensors show that IPSec is >not affordable for this kind of device, and we put an unconditional >MUST, in a few years from now we will have billions of device which do >not respect RFC4294. With a SHOULD it is the same kind of issue, >billions of device will be the exception. What is the harm if 1 million sensors are not respecting RFC 4294? John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
