Mark, On 2009-05-15 12:11, Mark Andrews wrote: ... > > [] is a kludge to get around protocols that had ":" already > embedded as a token seperator. > > ISC looked at this over 10 years ago when we were developing > BIND 9 and went with <address>#<port> where address can > have a scope identifier %scope.
If we could rewrite history a) TimBL would not have relied on semantics to distinguish names from addresses in URIs b) IPNGWG would have chosen a different separator than : but I think we can't rewrite history. We had this discussion prior to RFC3732 iirc. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------