Hi Bob,

> Then IPv4 would have had bigger addresses....  :-)

I think you did all you could to remedy that, and now
we just need to find a way to make it all play together.

RANGER (and now RANGERS) is IMHO a close approximation
of what the big picture might look like.

Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:38 PM
> To: Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: Mark Andrews; 6man; Dave Thaler
> Subject: Re: Review requested:
draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation-02
> 
> Brian,
> 
> > If we could rewrite history
> 
> Then IPv4 would have had bigger addresses....  :-)
> 
> Bob
> 
> p.s. Sorry, couldn't resist.
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to