-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James, Mark
Thanks for the addition to the list. FYI, I asked my local netops group (that's JANOG) on the mailing list what their prefernce was, and it came down to two choices. [] or #. Several comments were made against # (some would parse it as comment, it is not usable in URIs, etc). > Solaris does the same as FreeBSD. Regardless of what future standards > might say, I suspect it'd be impossible to change for fear of > compatibility problems. Maybe so. If a difference in IPv4 has worked for us thus far, we may be able to live with the difference in IPv6, (although I myself would prefer []), except for Dave's 2001:4860:b003::68:80 example. Regards, Seiichi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) iD8DBQFKDX9gcrhTYfxyMkIRAjXlAJ9uQkiWmTnfYi2rFD4h0S1+D4QPZACdFzd0 EasU2Yw4GXEHPv9fOj6GjEI= =b2bP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
