> -----Original Message----- > From: Seiichi Kawamura [mailto:kawamu...@mesh.ad.jp] > > Maybe so. > If a difference in IPv4 has worked for us thus far, > we may be able to live with the difference in IPv6, > (although I myself would prefer []), > except for Dave's 2001:4860:b003::68:80 example.
As long as people are giving suggestions, one that seems totally unambiguous in all respects, and compact, would be to simply as "p" in front of the port number. Can't be confused with hex, works with IPv4 in IPv6, or IPv6, doesn't require brackets, and it does not depend on maximum use of the :: convention. 2001:4860:b003::68p80 Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
