Jared Mauch
On Aug 16, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Ole Troan <o...@cisco.com> wrote: >>>> please ping my router, it's interface address is: >>>> fe80::20e:cff:fe5c:b001/64 >>>> >>>> my monitoring system can't ping this to ensure liveness of the >>>> interface either :( >>> >>> but they can ping whatever global /128 you put on that interface, so why >>> doesn't that solve the problems? >> >> Because you are then using one set of addresses for protool peerings >> and another one for global ping - thus making life more complicated >> for the operator. > > is that any more "complicated" (I don't quite understand that argument) than > using IS-IS? > Yes. > cheers, > Ole > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
