On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:06:23 -0500, "George, Wes E [NTK]" <wesley.e.geo...@sprint.com> wrote:
> draft-blake-ipv6-flow-label-nonce-02 is expired and I haven't heard much > effort to push it forward again. IMO it would be more helpful to consider > security implications and evaluate your solution with > draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-03, > draft-donley-6man-flowlabel-transport-sig-00, etc in mind. I believe that > it should integrate well, but I'd rather see a draft revision that takes > this explicitly into consideration. I won't be revising my draft until some consensus emerges on the use of the flow label. Regards, // Steve -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
