On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Rémi Després <remi.desp...@free.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 8 sept. 2010 à 03:18, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The authors of draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update (now also
>> including Shane Amante) are working on a new version. One
>> fundamental issue that has come up is about the (lack of)
>> security properties of the flow label. The most brutal
>> expression of this is:
>>
>> The flow label field is always unprotected (no IP header
>> checksum, not included in transport checksums, not included in
>> IPsec checksum). It cannot be verified and can be used as a
>> covert channel, so it will never pass a security analysis. Thus
>> some firewalls *will* decide to clear it, whatever the IETF
>> wants. This is inevitable, for exactly the same reason that the
>> diffserv code point is rewriteable at domain boundaries.
>>
>> If this is correct, it is futile to assert that the flow label
>> MUST be delivered unchanged to the destination, because we
>> cannot rely on this in the real world.
>>
>> Are we ready to accept this analysis?
>
> IMHO,yes.
>
> The consequence could be that a FL:
> - SHOULD be set by the packet source to a value that generally differs from a 
> flow to another (e.g. a 5-tuple hash)
> - MAY be reset to zero in intermediate nodes, but only for security reasons

clarifying question: "only for security reasons"
which are? (some examples at least here, perhaps not in the end-text)

-chris

> - MAY be reset to a non-zero value in intermediate nodes, provided this value 
> generally differs from a flow to another.
> An intermediate node that can identify 3-tuples but not 5-tuples SHOUL NOT 
> reset FLs to non-zero values.
>
> RD
>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>>   Brian Carpenter
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to