Le 9 sept. 2010 à 16:38, Iljitsch van Beijnum a écrit : > On 9 sep 2010, at 15:04, Rémi Després wrote: > ...
>> Subflows of MPTCP have different 5-tuples. >> They should be treated as different flows as far as load balancing is >> concerned. > > That depends on the flavor of MPTCP. > Certainly with the type of MPTCP that the wg of the same name is working on > right now this is the case. The WG MPTCP was the only MPTCP I was considering ;-). > ... > Also note that for instance SCTP, which is also multipath, doesn't have port > numbers. Well, SCTP *has* port numbers. It is "per-flow" port numbers that it doesn't have. Since each SCTCP flow (in this case SCTP "association") has its own address pair, 5-tuples can still be used to identify load-balancing flows. RD -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
