Le 22/09/2010 12:51, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Mark Smith wrote:

* Assuming a baseline of DNS being the only additional parameter over
addresses, you'd end up with -

o RA/SLAAC/RA DNS

I never supported RA DNS, I think it is a genuinely bad idea.

If RA DNS ever happens in widely available radvd implementations then I am keen to try it. It is useful in a setting where DHCPv6 is not available.

Alex

o RA/SLAAC/Stateless DHCPv6
o RA/Stateful DHCPv6
o Stateful DHCPv6 Only

I see quite a lot of code overlap in the last two.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to