One personal comment, I think the title should be changed to something like "Line Identification Destination Option" as it is proposing to create a new destination option and uses tunneling. In other words, it is no longer adding line identification to RS messages.
Bob On Oct 21, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Bob Hinden wrote: > 6MAN WG, > > This is a consensus call on adopting: > > Title : Line identification in IPv6 Router Solicitation > messages > Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. > Filename : draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt > Pages : 9 > Date : 2010-09-20 > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08 > > as a 6MAN working group document. The authors believe this version resolves > issues raised on the mailing list in the last consensus call. > > Please state your opinion, positive or negative, on the mailing or to the > chairs. This consensus call will end on October 18, 2010. > > Regards, > Bob & Brian > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
